Research Programs |
|
|
Home
Overview
Research Programs
Advanced Nuclear Power
Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Nuclear Systems Performance
Nuclear Energy-Sustainability
Nuclear Space Applications
Publications
Symposia
Educational Courses
Summer Internships
People
Contact
|
Nuclear Fuel CyclePublications:
Investigators :
High Burnup LWR Fuel Modeling and OptimizationOne primary initiative of optimizing the LWR fuel cycle is to improve the fuel utilization, i.e., to increase the fuel burnup. Historically, the average increase of discharge burnup in the 1990s has been about 1 MWd/kg per year for PWRs, which was mainly achieved by increasing the average reload enrichment. The front-end fuel cycle requirements, including the separative work and natural uranium ore requirements, have been reduced as burnup increased. However, due to a weak optimum of natural uranium utilization around 5 w/o enrichment, there are not as strong incentives as before to push for higher burnup from the front-end of the fuel cycle. However, increasing the capacity factor by reducing the refueling frequency and more recently, limited spent fuel storage capacity have induced the utilities to examine achieving burnup in the 70 to 100 MWd/kg range in LWRs. Neutronic investigations show that the reactivity-limited burnup potential is affected largely by the hydrogen-to-heavy-metal ratio. Either wetter or very dry UO2/H2O lattices are preferable to those having an epithermal spectrum. Higher fuel burnup is beneficial to enhancing the proliferation resistance (worse plutonium vector in the spent fuel) as well as reducing the total volume and possibly the heat load of the spent fuel per unit energy generation. High burnup has a significant impact on fuel performance requirements. For example, an increase of fission gas release is expected as burnup increases. Fuel pin design needs to be properly revised to incorporate the changes of thermal, mechanical, and material responses of fuel rods at high burnup under both the steady-state operations and transient conditions. A review of potential fuel materials has been conducted. The steady-state NRC fuel performance code, FRAPCON-3, was revised to extend the fuel burnup range for both UO2 and ThO2. A revision of the transient fuel modeling code, FRAPTRAN, is underway. There are several distinct high-burnup core management schemes, among which the long cycle core is one interesting option under current investigation as described by other projects in the activities report.
|