Publications
Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program
High Performance Fuel Design For Next Generation PWRs: Final Report
M.S. Kazimi, P. Hejzlar, et al.
MIT-NFC-PR-082 (January 2006)
Abstract
This summary provides an overview of the results of the U.S. DOE funded NERI (Nuclear Research Energy Initiative) program on development of the internally and externally cooled annular fuel for high power density PWRs. This new fuel was proposed by MIT to allow a substantial increase in power density (on the order of 30% or higher) while maintaining or improving safety margins. A comprehensive study was performed by a team consisting of MIT (lead organization), Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Gamma Engineering Corporation, Framatome ANP (formerly Duke Engineering) and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited. The study involved the evaluation of the new fuel in terms of thermal hydraulic, neutronics, fuel performance including first scoping irradiation tests at the MIT reactor, fuel manufacturing and economics.
The proposed fuel is of annular shape and has both internal and external cooling, as shown in Figure ES-1. To provide sufficient flow rate through the inner cooling channel, significantly larger rod size than the typical fuel rods of 17x17 PWR fuel arrays has to be employed. Therefore, for a fixed assembly size, the PWR fuel assembly has a smaller number of annular fuel rods.
Figure ES-1 Schematic of solid and internally and externally cooled annular fuel (not to scale)
A transition from solid to annular geometry has two important implications that allow power density increases: (1) reduction of conduction path thickness, which improves margin from peak fuel temperature to melting and (2) increased heat transfer surface area (in spite of a reduction of the number of fuel rods), which improves the margin for Departure from Nucleate Boiling Ratio (DNBR).
The overall objective of this NERI project was to examine the potential for improving safety and economics of pressurized water reactors (PWRs) through a high-performance externally and internally cooled annular fuel. This has been pursued through the following tasks:
- Identify the most promising fuel assembly arrangement for PWRs to achieve a significant increase in power density of at least 30 percent; based to a large extent on the extensive PWR UO2 fuel database to minimize R&D development expenses and the risks associated with transition to a new fuel materials. Optimize the fuel for superior thermal hydraulic performance. Examine flow distribution, core pressure drop, departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR), and resistance to parallel channel instabilities.
- Perform safety analyses, such as loss of coolant accident (LOCA) analyses, to confirm safety benefits for the optimum configuration identified in item (1).
- Evaluate the neutronic fuel design to achieve high reactivity-limited burn-up and a refueling cycle comparable to current PWR practice to attain good economic features. Confirm the acceptability of the coefficients for reactivity feedback and reactivity control.
- Select fabrication processes to produce annular fuel elements with the required product characteristics, including fissile loading and high integrity cladding, which are capable of eventual scale-up into efficient production processes for economic and reliable fuel element performance.
- Evaluate the materials and mechanical performance of UO2 fuel forms obtained by production technologies different from current U.S. practices (e.g., vibropacked fuel), and operating under new conditions (such as very low fuel temperature). Develop models for assessing fuel performance as well as for scoping irradiation tests performed at the research reactor of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
- Estimate the economic cost or benefit in cases of using the annular fuel for uprating current Generation II PWRs or in new advanced PWRs.

